Assessment Plan

Computer Science / About / Assessment Plan

Program Educational Objectives

Within the general framework of a Reformed Christian, undergraduate, liberal arts education, as described in An Engagement with God's World: the Core Curriculum of Calvin College, alumni of the Calvin University programs in computing, five years after graduation, should be:

  1. Pursuing vocations in computing in a socially and ethically responsible way, as informed by a Reformed Christian world-view (cf. the department mission statement), in order to advance the kingdom of Jesus Christ.
  2. Engaging in continuing professional development in order to support life-long learning.
  3. Developing mastery of and exhibiting leadership in one or more areas of computing.
  4. Functioning well on teams by exhibiting Christian virtues such as servant leadership, humility, encouragement and stewardship.
  5. Applying their liberal arts education to effectively function in their personal and professional lives.

Student Learning Outcomes

Graduates of the Calvin University BCS program will be able to:

  1. Analyze a complex computing problem and to apply principles of computing to identify solutions.
  2. Design, implement, and evaluate a computing-based solution to meet a given set of computing requirements.
  3. Communicate effectively in a variety of professional contexts.
  4. Recognize professional responsibilities and make informed judgments in computing practice based on legal and ethical principles as informed by a Reformed Christian worldview.
  5. Function effectively as a member or leader of a team engaged in computing-related activities.
  6. Apply computer science theory and software development fundamentals to produce computing-based solutions.

In addition to these program outcomes, all courses maintain their own course-level outcomes. These outcomes are published on the individual course homepages (see the courses page).

Assessment Plan

Computing is a dynamic, rapidly changing discipline. As a result, the Department of Computer Science assesses the program objectives and the student learning outcomes by doing the following:

  1. Conduct the following assessment activities:
    1. Graduating seniors take a major field test in their Perspectives on Computing course (CS-384), usually taken during the spring semester of their senior year. Computer science majors take the Educational Testing Services Computer Science Major Field Assessment Test (CS-MFT). Information systems majors take a similar test (if available). The CS-384 instructor provides the test results to the department for use in comparing our programs against other computing programs and to initiate change as appropriate.
    2. Students and graduates of all our departmental programs are surveyed each year. The surveys are administered as follows:
      1. A senior assessment survey asks graduating seniors to assess their program. This survey is initiated by the department late each spring and administered in the capstone course.
      2. A graduate survey includes both university-wide and department-specific questions. This survey is administered by Calvin's Center for Social Research and is directed at graduates one year out and five years out.
      The data for both of these surveys are collected by the university and delivered to the department for review and action as appropriate.
    3. Faculty members undergo period reappointment procedures for the university. The department is formally involved in this process and uses the following definition of scholarship.
    4. The department curriculum committee evaluates the following things, proposing changes to the department as appropriate:
      • ACM knowledge unit reports—Faculty members report their coverage of the required ACM CS knowledge units in each required course each time a new version of the ACM publishes a new version of the knowledge units and when a faculty member teaches a new course.
      • Key assignment data - The sample assignment work submitted by the faculty for the following key assignments:
        • CS 108 major project
        • CS 214 major project
        • CS 262 final team project (including the documentation, presentation and code)
        • CS 384 paper integrating faith and computing
        • CS 396/8 final project (including report, presentation and system)
        The faculty provide top, bottom, and median solutions to each key assignment along with an evaluation according to the department grading rubric. The curriculum committee reviews the work and grading as specified by the grading rubric. The rhetorical assignments specified here are part of the department’s rhetoric program. These data are collected every third year for each course and provided to the curriculum committee in early Fall for review and action as appropriate.
    5. The department meets with its strategic partners council (see partners council page) at least once per semester. These meetings are coordinated by the council, and the results are provided to the department by the department chair, who is the department's representative on the council.
    6. Faculty and courses are evaluated using the campus-wide assessment instrument. This activity is administered by the academic deans each semester for selected courses and faculty. The results are provided to the department chair, who reviews them and forwards issues to the personnel or curriculum committees as appropriate.
    7. The department curriculum committee reviews the program educational objectives, student learning outcomes and assessment plan, recommending changes to the department as required. This is done every third year.
  2. Conduct a sixth year external assessment—Every six years, the department undergoes an external review by an evaluation team from the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) as part of the accreditation process for its BCS program. This process is initiated by the department’s formal request for evaluation to ABET, and the resulting self-study questionnaire and ABET visitation report dictate changes to the department’s processes.

The department chair coordinates these assessment activities, referring the results to the department or department committee as appropriate. All formal review and action is done by the department and documented in the department meeting minutes. The department chair also produces an annual state of the department report summarizing these data and delivering them to the academic dean during a meeting early each fall.

Take the next step:

SOCIAL MEDIA

The latest sights & sounds | #calvinuniversity

Female student wading in Plaster Creek, examining a sample of water, holding it up to the sky.

ACADEMIC OPTIONS

With over 100 majors and programs, you’re bound to find something you love.

Browse by category

× CLOSE DRAWER
A dramatic view looking up at the Calvin's Crossing bridge, with a perfect blue sky overhead.

Apply to Calvin

It all starts here! We accept applications on a rolling basis throughout the year. All completed applications receive equal consideration.

Start your journey × CLOSE DRAWER
A female and male student walking side by side down the Calvin's Crossing bridge, conversing with eachother.

Visit Calvin

Find the visit option that works best for you and get a taste for life at Calvin!

Browse Visit Options Launch the virtual tour × CLOSE DRAWER
Students huddled around, lighting sparklers with a beautiful evening sky behind them.

Request Info

Learn why Calvin’s dedication to faith and discovery have earned it the rank of #3 among regional midwest universities.

Loading...
Graduates in their robes, tossing their caps high into the air, laughing.

Costs & Financial Aid

Families from all economic backgrounds—many just like yours—are making Calvin work. Scholarships, grants and loans are the tools that make Calvin possible.

Explore financial aid & Scholarships How much does Calvin cost? × CLOSE DRAWER
Top